Latest Forum Posts http://www.es-uk.info/forums/latestposts.asp http://www.es-uk.info/images/rss.png http://www.es-uk.info/forums/index.asp # Posted: 3 Sep 2010 19:20
Reply Quote

I have tried to describe my views about the ongoing processes with electrosensitive persons in a more explainable way.
See: http://www.milieuziektes.nl/Pagina111.html
http://www.es-uk.info/forums/thread.asp?threadID=248 bitje 2010-09-3 Sorry to hear of your bad experiences. Please contact yor power providers and ask them to remove them, or have you done this already? If not contact your local MP youll may be surprised how companies take action or shall we say listen and help put a normal meter in. Good luck. http://www.es-uk.info/forums/thread.asp?threadID=274 Researcher 2010-09-2 http://www.wirelesspowerconsortium.com/blog/2010/08/ http://www.es-uk.info/forums/thread.asp?threadID=289 Researcher 2010-08-31 Hi, Sarah

Take care, and welcome to the forum! You arent alone, and you arent mad as many people want to think! It will all hit the fan in the next couple of years, as im meeting more and more people coming down with the symptoms at work. http://www.es-uk.info/forums/thread.asp?threadID=288 Researcher 2010-08-28 I have two ideas re raising awareness of ES and EMR effects on health generally. One is to find a celebrity or anyone with a high profile to support this in some way - not sure how.

I would like one day to buy land on a Greek island for such people to have as a retreat. More and more people are retreating to places where they can escape the constant bombarment from towers etc, and this in itself would eventually become newsworthy. There are already a few places in the world where this is being attempted; it would be good to get some coverage on this.

Sarah http://www.es-uk.info/forums/thread.asp?threadID=287 Ianthe 2010-08-27 Welocome! To the club! Keep safe, And talk to others.
This is becoming a big problem out there. http://www.es-uk.info/forums/thread.asp?threadID=286 Researcher 2010-08-24 Like the idea of that! Well so far my 2G seems to be better! With the air tube.

As my work needs me to use a laptop, im contemplating to us a Dongle [ when necessary] which is normally attached to the side of the laptop. But possiably using a long USB cable? so keeping the wireless well away from me.

As phones used by others, when sending data, or logging on to a tower, or just talking on them at a distance from me, are not to bad. Depending on the location?? http://www.es-uk.info/forums/thread.asp?threadID=225 Researcher 2010-08-24 Yes. When I enter an area I presume will be toxic and I know I will be there for hours I start trying to endure the pain. I get tense and such. It can be some time before I find I am not actually under attack. http://www.es-uk.info/forums/thread.asp?threadID=285 cdc 2010-08-15 I wonder about that myself. Maybey for a lot of people a small bit of radiation is good for them.

http://www.es-uk.info/forums/thread.asp?threadID=284 cdc 2010-08-15 not quite clear - is this software? hardware? not sure if this is a sales pitch or helpful tip?

M http://www.es-uk.info/forums/thread.asp?threadID=266 Matt_B 2010-08-14 I have also tried Qi Gong. I did for a year. I found it to be a valuable experience, its a great way to disconnect from this electric world and I found it helped improve my general level of health. You need to find a practioner who really knows how to do it, and can maybe even help with your particular objective. I would have continued but the place where the sessions took place was right under a cell phone tower.
Lloyd
ElectricSense.com http://www.es-uk.info/forums/thread.asp?threadID=108 Lloyd_Burrell 2010-08-14 Ceriane
I've just been reading all your postings which sound so similar to me.
Just a word of warning though - please be careful of "neutralisers" and "frequency changers" such as EarthCalm.
In fact I became ES sensitive as a result of using a G-Oyster (which is meant to protect you from wifi and mobiles!)
I was fine until the day I used the G-Oyster in conjunction with my mobile phone, but since that day I have had very similar symptoms to you.
Have you looked at the em-fields site? It is very good indeed.
Best, CZB http://www.es-uk.info/forums/thread.asp?threadID=197 CZB999 2010-08-9 http://yourfreedom.hmg.gov.uk/restoring-civil-liberties/restore-people2019s-and-council2019s-right-to-turn-down-phone-masts-on-health-grounds http://www.es-uk.info/forums/thread.asp?threadID=283 Researcher 2010-08-2 http://www.nhs.uk/conditions/mobile-phone-safety/Pages/Introduction.aspx#commentCountLink http://www.es-uk.info/forums/thread.asp?threadID=282 Researcher 2010-08-1 I hope the phone co people don't lose too much sleep over that one.
Though they can stop using the things if they do.
http://www.es-uk.info/forums/thread.asp?threadID=281 cdc 2010-07-30 'How to help ruin a nation’s health: radio-emitting CFLs and wireless Smart Meters' - reads the headline in the ES-UK June newsletter. Quite.

The scientific literature shows that the danger of chronic exposure to low intensity radiowaves has been known for decades, particularly in the military. See Michael Bevington's new book, 'Electromagnetic sensitivity and Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity', page 14. 'Radiowave Sickness' was first described in Germany in 1932.

There is only one explanation for this apparent madness. It constitutes a significant part of the global population control agenda. Dr George Carlo has warned of the tsunami of EMR-induced cancers and degenerative diseases that are going to roll over Western countries in the next five years.

Dr Dietrich Klinghardt and others are issuing dire warnings too. See
http://electromagnetichealth.org/audio-archives-and-more/

See my site www.policestateplanning.com, Alan Watt at www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com, and Alex Jones at www.infowars.com
Alex's film 'End Game':
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x-CrNlilZho

Regards,
Mike http://www.es-uk.info/forums/thread.asp?threadID=280 mike 2010-07-25 Swedish Experts dismiss study on "mobile master's harmlessness" for small children:

According to a new study should not pose any increased risk for small children to live near a mobilmast. The study's credibility is questioned by the expert Mona Nilsson, who dismiss it as pure propaganda to defend economic interests.
The study has just reached the public by Sveriges Television (Report) and TT, according to journalist and environmental economist Mona Nilsson partially funded by the mobile industry and scientists have not really checked how much radiation from mobile phone masts or mobile base stations that the children actually suffered, "she says.

Mona Nilsson for many years monitored the issue of risks associated with wireless communications and some time ago, her new book "mobile radio health risks - facts about our greatest
environmental and health scandal ". The book is a successor to the book "Game of 3G - facts and disinformation in the wireless community."

According to Mona Nilsson study is an example of industry-driven research:

"The data estimates of children's exposure during fetal life was based on, which in turn formed the basis for the mobile industry's new joyful, came entirely from the right mobile industry. This is not science. It is propaganda to defend the huge economic interests. The aim is to lull the public and policymakers into a false security about the risks of forced exposure in people's own homes as mobile phone technology inevitably entails, "she writes in a press release.

After many years has followed the debate around mobile telephony Mona Nilsson has raised the question the uncritical media coverage in Sweden.

"This is the third time in only a few months as the general public in Sweden were deceived by the uncritical media who can not see through the manipulation of science. In February, claimed Radiation Safety Authority (SSM) that it was "highly unlikely" that the transmitters such as mobile telephony, wireless networking or broadcasting carries an increased cancer risk.

No journalist reviewed the foundations of the baseless claim, which, incidentally, is unlikely, like BP's assertion in February that it would be "unlikely" that an oil leak could occur in the Gulf of Mexico. Repeated studies have shown that contrary mobile radiation is carcinogenic, "said Mona Nilsson.

Over the years, Mona studied all reports of the electromagnetic radiation health effects on humans, animals and nature, and the result is clearly disappointing and, believe Mona Nilsson who is disappointed that the authorities and industry tone down and cover up the risks.

- I also confirmed the cancer risks of which it has long been observed in the real world. Far too many reports of unusual occurrences of cancer near the mobile towers are already documented. Several have been removed since many children had abnormal cancer in the neighborhood. Now you want to use this study who did not say anything about cancer risks, to suggest that abnormal accumulations of cancer around mobile phone masts are not due to radiation. It is very cynical, "says Mona Nilsson for The Epoch Times.

According to the French newspaper Le Progrès, Lyon has decided to remove a mobilmast and off three other schools during school hours in Victor Hugo, after the children affected by cancer. Mobile must be set very close to their classrooms and it has brought strong protests from parents of school children. It also requires that the threshold for permissible radiation is reduced and that independent measurements of radiation levels is carried out continuously. Cellular Antennas have also been removed from other schools' proximity to France.

In the Spanish city of Valladolid is the school Garcia Quintana, which have been featured in the Lancet. On a roof 42 feet from the school was a forest of 60 antennas. A number of children that have been affected by cancer within one year after the antennas were set up - before then, the school's 32-year history has never been any cases of childhood cancer. School children's parents kept their children home as long as the antennas are not switched off. A judge ordered that the antennas must be shut down.

As an example of incorrect media reporting takes Mona Nilsson up to the international Interphone Study, which had allegedly come to the conclusion that cell phones would not increase the risk of brain tumors, although the study actually showed that the current normal user runs between 40 and 100 percent increased risk of fatal brain tumor.

The study results confirmed the Swedish Research Hardellgruppens from Örebro showed increased brain tumor risk, particularly for young people where the risk was increased by up to 700 percent, not the media should have reported.

One month after the Interphone study was the Australian Radiation Protection Agency urged children to limit mobile phone use, "says Mona Nilsson.

She says that authorities worldwide recognize that children are more sensitive to radiation, but not the Swedish Radiation Protection authorities. In many countries, calls on children to reduce the use of mobile phone. In Sweden, the media reported that the Interphone study showed no risk, but most international media have written that the Interphone show that cell phone increases the risk of brain tumors.

Mona Nilsson believes that this is completely unacceptable, the public must be critical and objective reporting of the issue:

"Journalists must understand that research is a minefield and begin to become aware of the ongoing corruption of science whose purpose is to protect economic interests."

Svensk expert avfärdar studien om ”mobilmasters ofarlighet” för små barn:
”Det är inte vetenskap. Det är propaganda”
Susanne Larsson, Epoch Times Sverige
http://www.epochtimes.se/articles/2010/06/29/19496.html http://www.es-uk.info/forums/thread.asp?threadID=279 Researcher 2010-07-8 http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-07-08/buy-a-mobile-phone-in-san-francisco-get-a-label-on-cancer-risk.html

Cigarette packs in the U.S. have been branded with government health warnings since 1965. Now San Francisco’s city government has brought warning labels to the Information Age, voting 10-1 to require that stores post the level of radio waves emitted by each mobile phone they sell.

The city’s Board of Supervisors approved the ordinance June 22, with some provisions taking effect Nov. 1. In passing the law, called the “Cell Phone Right-to-Know Ordinance,” San Francisco jumped into a murky minefield of dueling scientists and conflicting findings, Bloomberg Businessweek reports in its July 12 issue.

There’s no scientific consensus on whether the kind of radiation exposure created by frequent mobile-phone use can lead to cancer, as many fear. The latest study to grapple with the issue, released last month by the World Health Organization, couldn’t find a conclusive link. That kind of uncertainty leaves consumer advocates asking for more clarity.

“It totally makes sense to give consumers more information,” says Renee Sharp, a scientist with the Environmental Working Group in Oakland, California, which supports the measure. “We are not saying we know cell phones cause cancer.”

A cell phone’s main source of radio frequency, or RF, energy is produced through the antenna. The closer the antenna is to the head, the higher the exposure, according to the National Cancer Institute.

Last month’s WHO-supported study reported a “suggestion,” backed up by incomplete data, that the heaviest phone use may be tied to gliomas, the most common type of brain tumor and the one that claimed the life of Senator Edward Kennedy last year.

Swedish Study

A more worrying 2005 study from Sweden reported a possible link between brain cancers and mobile phone use. The researchers behind both studies caution that it can take years or decades of exposure to a cancer-causing agent for a tumor to appear, and because heavy cell phone use is a relatively new phenomenon, they need more time and data to study the issue.

Furthermore, Mary McBride, a scientist at the British Columbia Cancer Agency and a co-author of the WHO report, says that most studies, including hers, excluded children, whose brains absorb more energy than adults and whose phone use has grown exponentially.

The Federal Communications Commission currently regulates cell phone emissions based on the amount of radio frequency energy absorbed by the body during phone use, a metric called the “specific absorption rate.”

The maximum SAR allowed under a 20-year-old standard is 1.6 watts per kilogram of body weight, and anything under that is considered safe, at least by the FCC. The San Francisco ordinance will require sellers to post the SAR of each phone.

Sowing Confusion

That may confuse consumers, says John Walls, a spokesman for CTIA-The Wireless Association, a trade group in Washington, D.C. that represents Dallas-based AT&T Inc.; Nokia Oyj of Espoo, Finland, the world’s biggest maker of mobile phones; Seoul-based LG Electronics Inc. and New York-based Verizon Communications Inc. among mobile-phone companies. Posting the ratings may lead consumers to infer that phones with higher SAR numbers are more dangerous, he said.

“As long as those devices meet or fall below the FCC standard, they are all considered safe. Period,” Walls said in a June 29 telephone interview.

Consumers and activists think transparency can’t hurt. Ellie Marks, of nearby Lafayette, California, was pleased by San Francisco’s decision. Her husband, Alan, has a brain tumor she believes was caused by his frequent use of mobile phones. An early adopter, he got his first phone in 1987 and for two decades he used it more than 500 hours a year, mostly glued to his right ear, she said.

Avoidable Risks

In May 2008, he was diagnosed with a glioma in his right frontal lobe. Since then Ellie Marks has become an advocate for educating customers about what she calls the avoidable risks of mobile phones, testifying before Congress as well as the California and Maine state legislatures. In each case, measures to provide information on the radio frequency emissions of phones were defeated.

Now that she’s tasted victory in San Francisco, though, she says she’ll keep pushing. Next up: the city of Burlingame, California, population 28,000, where Councilman Michael Brownrigg plans to introduce a bill modeled on the one passed by its neighbor to the north.

Marks may soon find herself back before Congress, too. On June 30, Representative Dennis Kucinich, a Democrat from Ohio and two-time candidate for U.S. president, announced he’ll introduce a right-to-know bill similar to San Francisco’s.

The mobile phone industry, meanwhile, is expressing its displeasure with its wallet. After October, the CTIA says, its annual trade show will no longer grace San Francisco.

“We thought the Board of Supervisors’ decision sent a very clear message,” Walls says. “We weren’t wanted in San Francisco.”

To contact the reporter on this story: Rob Waters in San Francisco at rwaters5@bloomberg.net. http://www.es-uk.info/forums/thread.asp?threadID=278 Researcher 2010-07-8 Prof. Olle Johansson, a long-time critic of wireless communications technology based on his research, has been informed that his offices and lab are required for other purposes, effectively blocking privatelysupported experiments scheduled for August and September. Johansson is associate professor and head of department at the Experimental Dermatology Unit in the institute’s Department of Neuroscience in Stockholm. He is also a professor with the Swedish Royal Institute of Technology.
Johansson first came to the attention of the public when his work led to improved computer screens to protect office workers from what he found as the adverse effects of radiation emitted from monitors.
Next month’s planned experiments are intended to replicate the experiments of Dr. Magda Havas of Trent U University, Canada whose work led to the cancellation of wi-fi in San Francisco and the recent new law requiring warning labels on mobile phones. San Francisco has yet to address the issue of radiation from mobile phone and other telecommunications masts.
Observers claim the current controversy at the Karolinska Institute follows Johansson’s efforts to assist activists in Ireland opposed to the proliferation of telecommunications masts to protect children who absorb up to 75 percent of this type of radiation into their brains. During a visit to Ireland he was quoted as saying “No level of radiation is safe.” The cash-strapped Irish government through the communications regulatory body, ComReg, has introduced what it calls “Test and Trial”, a program where companies are invited to test their wireless equipment in a live environment.
Most recently, Ericsson, the Swedish telecommunications giant conducted tests in the 2.3GHz band at speeds of up to 80MBits/sec using a license issued under ComReg’s Test and Trial licensing program. The experiment used TD-LTE, originally promoted by China Mobile using paired spectrum with separated channels as a competitior to Intel’s Wimax, signal. The TD-LTE technology provides high-speed broadband services which can be used to support services such as high-definition TV, video conferencing and many others” without the need for new devices. Ericsson has two Irish addresses: one in Dublin and its Software Campus at Athlone, Co. Westmeath, the company’s first R&D lab outside Sweden.
The test was conducted using a “large black box” broadcasting from a taxi. No mention of public safety of the test was made by Ericsson.
Two weeks ago, the city of San Francisco passed the first law in the US requiring retailers to display the amount of radiation given off by mobile phones. In retaliation after the vote, the CTIA wireless trade group called off its Autumn show, set for San Francisco. The city stands to lose $80 million in economic activity generated by the 3-day Enterprise and Applications Show, attended by 68,000 visitors. The show has been staged In San Francisco five of the last seven years
Last week U.S. President Barack Obama signed a memorandum doubling the number of frequencies available for wireless devices. The move is intended to create jobs and boost investment in the $153 billion wireless market over the next 10 years. The availability of a bigger chunk of wireless spectrum would allow faster delivery of data and video onto smart phones and other next-generation devices. Digital television is generally regarded as particularly dangerous by the physics community due to the large volume of information incorporated into the carrier waves.
Obama’s memo jump-starts an effort to make available over the next 10 years 500 megahertz of government and commercial spectrum, which reflects a recommendation by the Federal Communications Commission in its National Broadband Plan released in March. In the nation's largest cities, local TV stations use about 150 megahertz, according to the National Broadband Plan.
Researchers such as Dr. George Carlo, of the Science and Public Policy Institute at the Institute for Healthful Adaptation in Washington, D.C. assert that it is not the microwaves but microwaves which carry information that are the cause of the drastic increase in a number of diseases. In Ireland, for example, in a request for funding infection-free examination rooms for cancer patients, the Royal College of Physicians in Ireland (RCPI) predicted last week that by the year 2025, half the population will suffer from some form of cancer.
In April, The European Academy for Environmental Medicine issued the Wuerzberg Appeal, outlining the increasing prevalence of chronic multisystem illnesses such as multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS), chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), fibromyalgia (FMS) as well as cardiovascular diseases, metabolic syndrome, neurodegenerative diseases, auto immune diseases and cancer. These multisystem diseases are considered chronic inflammatory processes influenced by environmental factors including chemical pollutants, biological infectious agents and electromagnetic field (EMF) triggers.
Johansson’s difficulties began last year when he was approached by Staffan Cullheim, head of the neuroscience department, who informed the professor he was to vacate his premises immediately because they were to be used as an “animal house for ferrets”.
Johansson refused point blank and the issue was dropped. The professor became ill and required surgery. Still convalescing, he returned to work and was again confronted by Cullheim, this time with plans to use his office and lab for an imaging facility.
Commenting on the Karolinska Institute’s attempted closure of Johansson’s research facilities, Dr. Carlo, said, "Olle Johansson's lab is one of the few remaining places in the world where independent, non-industry funded research on EMR health effects is being
done. It would be a tragedy if he were to be suppressed from carrying on his work."
The Karolinska Institute has a long history of intellectual scientific rigor as well as honours. Each year the Nobel Assembly of 50 Karolinska professors collates the nominees for the world famous Nobel awards in the fields physiology or medicine.
Prof. Harriet Walberg-Henriksson, president of the Karolinska Institute, and Prof. Bernd Huber, chairman of the League of European Research Universities, have not responded to queries regarding Johansson’s status, research or the timing of the proposed closure of his lab. http://www.es-uk.info/forums/thread.asp?threadID=277 Researcher 2010-07-7 I was on ESA for one year (£65 per week) my Dr signed me off every 3 months as ES. I forgot to go to my medical (twice ! so they kicked me off it !! and now I have no income at all, as job seekers allowance will not pay out to me as the year they look at for NI contributions was the yrear I got sacked for being ES and started down the part time route so did not earn a lot that year. I doubt if I would have got through the medical anyway as I am fit enough to work but where and what I do not know ? http://www.es-uk.info/forums/thread.asp?threadID=40 TORCHWOOD 2010-07-7